Espionagem e a revelação de segredos estatais
uma análise do artigo 359-K, § 4º, do Código Penal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192XRICP2023v8n1p43-68Palabras clave:
espionagem, revelação de segredos estatais, segurança nacional, proteção de denunciantes, justificaçãoResumen
A alteração legislativa trazida pela Lei nº 14.197/2021, que introduziu o art. 359-K, § 4º, no Código Penal brasileiro, prevê causa de exclusão da responsabilidade criminal no caso de comunicação, entrega ou publicação de informações e documentos classificados como secretos, protegendo denunciantes contra condenações pela prática de espionagem, sempre que a finalidade da revelação seja expor a prática de crime ou a violação de direitos humanos. O presente artigo pretende enfrentar, primeiramente, se o legislador brasileiro, ao contrariar a tendência mundial neste tema, agiu bem ao inserir no ordenamento jurídico uma previsão legal dessa natureza. A seguir, será analisado criticamente o formato escolhido para a proteção penal de denunciantes contra sanções criminais. Finalmente, diante dos problemas que a redação do § 4º do art. 359-K do Código Penal suscita, serão feitas algumas considerações de
lege ferenda na tentativa de contorná-los.
Citas
ACKERMAN, John M.; SANDOVAL-BALLESTEROS, Irma E. The Global Explosion of Freedom of Information Laws. Administrative Law Review, [s.l.], v. 58, n. 1, p. 85-130, 2006.
AFTERGOOD, Steve. An Inquiry into the Dynamics of Government Secrecy. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, [s.l.], v. 48, p. 511-530, 2013.
AFTERGOOD, Steve. Reducing Government Secrecy: Finding What Works. Yale Law & Policy Review, [s.l.], v. 27, n. 2, p. 399-416, 2009.
ARNESON, Richard J. Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems. Ethics, [s.l.], v. 92, n. 4, p. 616-633, 1982.
BOK, Sissela. Secrets: On the Ethics of concealment and revelation. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982.
BOOT, Eric R. The Ethics of Whistleblowing. London/New York: Routledge, 2019.
BROWNLEE, Kimberley. The civil disobedience of Edward Snowden: A reply to William Scheuerman. Philosophy and Social Criticism, [s.l.], v. 42, n. 10, p. 965-970, 2016.
CONNELLY, Matthew. State Secrecy, Archival Negligence, and the End of The History as We Know it. In: POZEN, David E. (org.). The Perilous Public Square: structural Threats to Expression Today. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020.
DELMAS, Candice. The Ethics of Government Whistleblowing. Social Theory and Practice, [s.l.], v. 41, n. 1, p. 77-105, 2015.
DYCUS, Stephen; BANKS, William C.; RAVEN-HANSEN, Peter; VLADECK, Stephen I. National Security Law. 7. ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2020.
ELLSBERG, Daniel. Secrecy and National Security Whistleblowing. Social Research, [s.l.], v. 77, n. 3, p. 773-804, 2010.
EMERSON, Thomas. National Security and Civil Liberties. Yale Journal of World Public Order, [s.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 78-112, 1982.
FENSTER, Mark. Disclosure’s Effects: Wikileaks and Transparency. Iowa Law Review, [s.l.], v. 97, n. 3, p. 713-804, 2012.
FENSTER, Mark. The Transparency Fix. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2017.
FISCHER, Thomas. Strafgesetzbuch. 69. ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2022.
FORCESE, Craig; WEST, Leah. National Security Law. 2. ed. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2021.
FUCHS, Meredith. Judging Secrets: The Role Courts should play in preventing unnecessary secrecy. Administrative Law Review, [s.l.], v. 58, n.1, p. 131-176, 2006.
HALPERIN, Morton H.; BERMAN, Jerry J.; BOROSAGE, Robert L.; MARWICK, Christine M. The Lawless State: the Crimes of the U.S. Intelligence Agencies. New York: Penguin Books, 1976.
HART, Herbert Lionel Adolphus. Are there any natural rights? The Philosophical Review, [s.l.], v. 64, n. 2, p. 175-191, 1955.
HARWOOD, William H. Secrecy, transparency and government whistleblowing. Philosophy and Social Criticism, [s.l.], v. 43 n. 2, p. 164-186, 2017.
HEROLD, Nico. Government-Whistleblowing-Enthüllung und Kontrolle von staatlichen Missständen. Kritische Justiz, [s.l.], v. 52, n. 3, p. 338-348, 2019.
KATZ, Alan. Government Information Leaks and the First Amendment. California Law Review, [s.l.], v. 64, n. 1, p. 108-145, 1976.
KINDHÄUSER, Urs; HILGENDORF, Eric. §353b. Strafgesetzbuch. Lehr- und Praxiskommentar. 9. Auflage. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2022.
KITROSSER, Heidi. Classified Information leaks and Free of Speech. University of Illinois Law Review, [s.l.], n. 3, p. 881-931, 2008.
KÖBEL, Ralf; HEROLD, Nico. Whistleblowing und das Geheimwissen des Staates. Goltdammer’s Archiv für Strafrecht, [s.l.], v. 169, n. 7, p. 377-392, 2022.
KREIMER, Seth F. Rays of Sunlight in a Shadow War: FOIA, the Abuses of Anti-Terrorism, and the Strategy of Transparency. Lewis &Clark Law Review, [s.l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. 1141-1220, 2007.
KREIMER, Seth F. The Freedom of Information Act and the Ecology of Transparency. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, [s.l.], v. 10, p. 1011-1080, 2008.
KRIS, David S.; WILSON, J. Douglas (org.) National Security Investigations & Prosecutions 3d. Eagn: Thomson Reuters, v. 1, 2019.
KROTOSZYNSKI, Ronald. Whistleblowing Speech and the First Amendment. Indiana Law Journal, [s.l.], v. 93, n. 2, p. 267-302, 2018.
KWOKA, Margaret B. Deferring to Secrecy. Boston College Law Review, [s.l.], v. 54, n. 1, p. 185-242, 2013.
KWOKA, Margaret B. Leaking and Legitimacy. UC Davis Law Review, [s.l.], v. 48, n. 4, p. 1387-1456, 2015.
LASSWELL, Harold. D. National Security and Individual Freedom. New York: De Capo Press, 1971.
LAUFHÜTTE, Heinrich. Staatsgeheimnis und Regierungsgeheimnis. Goltdammer’s Archiv für Strafrecht, [s.l.], v. 121, p. 52-61, 1974.
LEITE, Alaor. A responsabilidade penal do whistleblower. Boletim IBCCrim, São Paulo, n. 348, p. 4-6, 2021.
MEESE, Michael J.; NIELSEN, Suzzane C.; SONDHEIMER, Rachel M. American National Security. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2019.
POZEN, David E. Freedom of Information beyond the Freedom of Information Act. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, [s.l.], v. 165, n. 5, p. 1097-1158, 2017.
POZEN, David E. Deep Secrecy. Stanford Law Review, v. 62, Issue 2, p. 257-339, 2010.
POZEN, David E. The Mosaic Theory National Security, and the Freedom of Information Act. Yale Law Journal, [s.l.], v. 115, n. 3, p. 628-679, 2005.
RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
RAWLS, John. Justice as fairness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
ROXIN, Claus; GRECO, Luís. Strafrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. Grundlagen – Der Aufbau der Verbrechenslehre. 5. Auflage. München: C.H. Beck, v. I, 2020.
SAGAR, Rahul. Das mißbrauchte Staatsgeheimnis. Wikileaks und die Demokratie. In: GEISELBERGER, Heinrich (ed.) Wikileaks und die Folgen. Netz-Medien-Politik. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2011. p. 201-223.
SAGAR, Rahul. Secrets and Leaks: The Dilemma of State Secrecy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.
SAVAGE, Ashley. Leaks, Whistleblowing and the Public Interest: the law of unauthorized disclosures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016.
SCHÄFER, Jürgen. § 353b. In: HEFENDEHL, Roland (hrsg.). Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch. 3. ed. München: C.H Beck, v. 5, 2019.
SCHAUER, Frederick. Transparency in three dimensions. University of Illinois Law Review, [s.l.], v. 4, p. 1339-1357, 2011.
SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane. Legal Secrets: Equality and Efficiency in the Common Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
SCHEUERMAN, William. Whistleblowing as civil disobedience: The case of Edward Snowden. Philosophy and Social Criticism, [s.l.], v. 40, n. 7, p. 609-628, 2014.
SCHEUERMAN, William. What Edward Snowden can teach theorists of conscientious law breaking. Philosophy and Social Criticism, [s.l.], v. 42, n. 10, p. 958-964, 2016.
SETTY, Sudha. National Security Secrecy. Comparative Effects on Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
THOMPSON, Dennis F. Democratic Secrecy. Political Science Quarterly, [s.l.], v. 114, n. 2, p. 181-193, 1999.
WUNDERLICH, Alexandre. Crime político, segurança nacional e terrorismo. São Paulo: Tirant lo Blanch, 2020.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
